Focus Constructions in Ǹjò̩-kóo
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Focusing is a universal syntactic phenomenon. That is, there is no language in the world that does not have a means of placing prominence on constituents for focus purposes. However, the formal expression of focus differs from one language to another. Some languages express focus morphologically by using distinct morphemes or elements while others employ suprasegmentally means. The paper, therefore examines the focus strategies in Ǹjò̩-Kóo. It gives a detailed description of different constituents that may be focused in the language and the changes that are triggered in the clause as a result of the focusing. Adopting the Minimalist Program of Chomsky (1995) and Cartographic analysis of Rizzi (1997) Split-CP projections within the clausal left periphery, the study investigates how focus clauses are derived in the language and reveals that the syntax of focus in the language involves two probes: focus (foc) and emphasis (emph) each of which can provoke displacement operations. The paper employs information and clause structure evidence to motivate the constituents being focused. It is also observed among other things, that the constituents that could be focused in Ǹjò̩-kóo are subject DP, object DP or object DP of preposition, possessor DP and a whole sentence, and that the language does not distinguish between sentence and verbal focus hence the same strategy is employed for both focus types.
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Arokoyo, B. (2013). Unlocking Focus Construction. Ilorin: Chridamel Publishing House.
Awobuluyi, O. (1978). Focus Constructions as Noun Phrases. Linguistics Analysis, 4(2).
Awobuluyi, O. (1992). Issues in the Syntax of Standard Yoruba Focus Construction. Journal Of West African Languages. XXIL, (2).
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries. The framework. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Chomsky, N. (1999). Derivation by phase. MIT occasional papers in linguistics 18 (also published in A life in language. M.Kenstowicz. Ed. 2001. Ken Hale. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.1-52.
Chomsky, N. (2002). On the nature and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Christiano, C. (2004). Phases and cartography in Linguistic computation toward a cognitively motivated computational model of linguistic competence. PhD. Thesis. Dept. of Linguistics. University of Siena.
Givon, T. (1991). Syntax: a Functional typological introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 2. Grammar. Eds. M..Leonetti, O Fernadez Soriano & V.Escandell Vidal. 10th colloquium on generative grammar. Selected papers,Universidad Alcala`de Henares 31-50
Gundel, J.K. (1988). Universals of Topic –Comment Structure. Studies in Syntactic Typology. M. Hammond, E.A. Moravcsik, and J.R. Wirth. Eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s publishing. 209-39.
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J. and Grohmann, K. (2005). Understanding Minimalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Olaogun, S.O. (2016). Information Structural Categories of the Ǹjò̩-Kóo Language in Akoko North-West of Ondo State, Nigeria. PhD. Thesis. Dept. of Linguistics and African Languages. University of Ibadan.
Olaogun, S. O. (2017). Predicate/Verb Focus in Àfá. Inquiry in African Languages and Literatures. 10, 154-163.
Radford, A. (2009). An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 398-399
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left pheriphery. Element of grammar. Handbook of generative syntax. L. Heageman. Ed. Dordrecht: kluwer. 281-337