RISK AND OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT IN MEP PROJECT-BASED COMPANIES AND ITS IMPACT ON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The board is crucial for MEP project-based organizations to progress. Gamble the board prevents cost overruns and project delays, while opportunity the executives capitalize on excellent opportunities. Chance administration in Pakistan's growth is the study's main focus, and Chance mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) management in project board in Pakistani development is reviewed. The evaluation included several hundred development (MEP) projects from Karachi, Lahore, Faisalabad, Rawalpindi, Islamabad Pakistan's five largest cities with active development and large investments. Surveys are sent to company managers via group inspection, and 250 responses are received mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) projects management. Data is analyzed using Savvy PLS's structured condition presentation. Business performance is connected to the board systems that are based on proven evidence, evaluation, checking and helped the construction project succeed. Risk executives' methods fundamentally and well affected job completion, according to the assessment. Understanding executive risk valuation is much better. The results reveal that that in terms of genuine development projects, an efficiency study may present a fuller picture of risk the board in various enterprises. The practice of conducting systematic audits to assess the philosophy of writing is rarely employed in the execution of executive projects and risk analysis. The results revealed that the effective mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) performance of the board tactics is in improving project execution in Pakistan. The exploratory approach is employed to integrate previous studies on risk management executives and the implementation of business ventures in the field of development.
JEL Classification Codes: G32.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Alzoubi, H. M. (2022). BIM as a tool to optimize and manage project risk management. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 7(1), 6307-6323.
Ben Mahmoud, B., Lehoux, N., Blanchet, P., & Cloutier, C. (2022). Barriers, strategies, and best practices for BIM adoption in quebec prefabrication small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Buildings, 12(4), 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040390
Briscoe, J., Qamar, U., Contijoch, M., Amir, P., & Blackmore, D. (2005). Pakistan’s water economy: Running dry. World Bank, Washington, DC, 3540.
Chien, K. F., Wu, Z. H., & Huang, S. C. (2014). Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: Empirical study. Automation in construction, 45, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.012
Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.004
During, S. R., Episodes, C., Linked, E. R., & Brear, A. S. (2021). Entrepreneurial and. Cases on Small Business Economics and Development During Economic Crises, 52.
Jaffee, S., Siegel, P., & Andrews, C. (2010). Rapid agricultural supply chain risk assessment: A conceptual framework. Agriculture and rural development discussion paper, 47(1), 1-64.
Jin, R., Yang, T., Piroozfar, P., Kang, B. G., Wanatowski, D., Hancock, C. M., & Tang, L. (2018). Project-based pedagogy in interdisciplinary building design adopting BIM. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(10), 1376-1397. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2017-0119
Javed, M. A. (2024). A Critical Analysis of the HVAC Business Model to Determine Its Success Criteria. The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations, 6(05), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmei/Volume06Issue05-09
Kardes, I., Ozturk, A., Cavusgil, S. T., & Cavusgil, E. (2013). Managing global megaprojects: Complexity and risk management. International business review, 22(6), 905-917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.01.003
Liu, L. C., Li, Q., Zhang, J. T., & Cao, D. (2016). Toward a framework of environmental risk management for CO 2 geological storage in China: gaps and suggestions for future regulations. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21, 191-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9589-9
Lavikka, R., Chauhan, K., Peltokorpi, A., & Seppänen, O. (2021). Value creation and capture in systemic innovation implementation: case of mechanical, electrical and plumbing prefabrication in the Finnish construction sector. Construction Innovation, 21(4), 837-856. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-05-2020-0070
Mburu, L. N. (2022). Factors influencing Adoption of Strategic Internal Change Management in Deposit taking SACCO'S in Mombasa County, Kenya.
Perusso, A. S. (2021). Experiential learning in management education: Evaluating the practice-turn.
Regona, M., Yigitcanlar, T., Xia, B., & Li, R. Y. M. (2022). Opportunities and adoption challenges of AI in the construction industry: A PRISMA review. Journal of open innovation: technology, market, and complexity, 8(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010045
Sheedy, E. (2021). Risk governance: Biases, blind spots and bonuses. Routledge.
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions. Business strategy and the environment, 20(4), 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682