INFLUENCE OF HUMIC ACID ON YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING CHARACTERS OF RIDGE GOURD

Main Article Content

Sanjoy Kumar Bordolui
Gouranga Sundar Mandal

Abstract

Humic acids are organic compounds that enhance agronomic parameters, plant growth, and soil characteristics. Humic acid-based products have recently been utilized in crop production to maintain the sustainability of agricultural output. Humic acid can enhance a variety of physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil, including texture, structure, water-holding capacity, cation exchange capacity, pH, soil carbon, enzymes, nitrogen cycling, and nutrient availability. This study emphasizes the significance of humic acid for crop growth, plant hormone production, nutrient uptake and assimilation, Yield, and protein synthesis. The study deals with the Effect of humic acid on growth, fruit weight, fruit volume, quality of fruit, and Yield per hectare of ridge gourd. The research was studied at the In-check Farm, BCKV, Mohanpur, Nadia, W.B., India, in the pre-kharif season of 2023, following RBD with three replications, seven treatments, and control.  Among the treatments, T6 had the highest fruit yield (127.908 q ha-1), followed by T5 in second place (109.842 q ha-1) and T1 in last place (70.480 q ha-1), with a significant difference between them. The average fruit yield and parameters associated with Yield were significantly higher for ridge gourds when 112 kg ha-1 of humic acid was applied in conjunction with the recommended dosage of fertilizers (T6). In all cases except days to flower initiation, T6 was highest among the other treatments. Hence, the humic acid (112 kg ha-1) along with FYM @ 20 kg ha-1, neem cake @ 600 kg ha-1, N @ 50 kg ha-1, P2O5 @ 25 kg ha-1, and K2O @ 25 kg ha-1 fertilizers were recommended for getting the maximum Yield, and quality of ridge guard.


JEL Classification Codes: Q22, Q120.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite
Bordolui , S. K. ., & Mandal , G. S. . (2024). INFLUENCE OF HUMIC ACID ON YIELD AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING CHARACTERS OF RIDGE GOURD . American International Journal of Agricultural Studies, 9(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.46545/aijas.v9i1.315
Section
Original Articles/Review Articles/Case Reports/Short Communications

References

Azcona, I., Pascual, I., Aguirreolea, J., Fuentes, M., García‐Mina, J. M., & Sánchez‐Díaz, M. (2011). Growth and development of pepper are affected by humic substances derived from composted sludge, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 174(6), 916-924. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201000264

Badr, M. A., Abou Hussein, S. D., El-Tohamy, W. A., & Gruda, N. (2010). Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Tomato under Various Methods of Fertilizer Application and Levels of Fertigation in Arid Lands. Gesunde Pflanzen, 62(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343- 010- 0219-5

Canellas, L. P., Balmori, D. M., Médici, L. O., Aguiar, N. O., Campostrini, E., Rosa, R. C., Façanha, A. R., & Olivares, F. L. (2013). Combining humic substances and Herbaspirillum seropedicae inoculation enhances the growth of maize (Zea mays L.) Plant Soil, 366, 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1382-5.

Canellas, L. P., & Olivares, F. L. (2014). Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoters. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 1, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-5641-1-3

Cao, D., Zong, L. G., Xiao, J., Zhang, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2010). Effects of bio-fertilizer on organically cultured cucumber growth and soil biological characteristics. Ying Yong sheng tai xue bao= The journal of applied ecology, 21(10), 2587-2592.

Elankavi, S., Nambi, J., Ramesh, S., Jawahar, S., & Lavanya, K. (2020). Influence of different doses of fertilizers and foliar spray of nutrients on Yield and yield attributes of rice. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 24(2) 1127-1134.

El-Galad, M. A., Sayed, D. A., & El-Shal, R. M. (2013). Effect of humic acid and compost applied alone or in combination with sulphur on soil fertility and faba bean productivity under saline soil conditions. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 4(10), 1139-1157.

Eshwar, M., Srilatha, M., Rekha, K. B., & Sharma, S. H. (2017). Effect of humic substances (humic, fulvic acid) and chemical fertilizers on nutrient uptake, dry matter production of aerobic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 6(5), 1063-1066.

Hebbar, S. S., Ramachandrappa, B. K., Nanjappa, H. V., & Prabhakar, M. (2004). Studies on NPK drip fertigation in field grown tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). European. J. Agron., 21, 117-127.

Karthick, K., Patel, G. S., & Prasad, J. G. R. (2017). Performance of Ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula L. Roxb). Varieties and nature of cultivation on growth and flowering attributes. Int. J. Agril. Sci., 9, 3910-3912.

Khattak, R. A., & Dost, M. (2010). Seed cotton yield and nutrient concentrations are influenced by lignitic coal-derived humic acid in salt-affected soils. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 26(1), 43-49.

Kumar, A., & Dwivedi, A. K. (2018). Growth and Yield of Ridge Gourd [Luffa acutangula L. (Roxb.)] as affected by application of nitrogen and potash fertilizers under the agro-climatic condition of zone prevailing in Bokaro district of Jharkhand., Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 8, 22-28.

Lamattina, L., García-Mata, C., Graziano, M., & Pagnussat, G. (2003). Nitric oxide: the versatility ofan extensive signal molecule. Annual review of plant biology, 54(1), 109-36.

Mahmoud, M. M., Hassanein, A. H., Mansour, S. F., & Khalefa, A. M. (2011). Effect of soil and foliar application of humic acid on growth and productivity of soybean plants grown on a calcareous soil under different levels of mineral fertilizers. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering, 2(8), 881-890.

Mora, V., Baigorri, R., Bacaicoa, E., Zamarreno, A. M., & García-Mina, J. M. (2012). The humic acid-induced changes in the root concentration of nitric oxide, IAA and ethylene do not explain the changes in root architecture caused by humic acid in cucumber. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 76, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.10.001

Muscolo, A., Sidari, M., & Nardi, S. (2013). Humic substance: relationship between structure and activity. Deeper information suggests univocal findings. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 129, 57-63.

Nardi, S., Muscolo, A., Vaccaro, S., Baiano, S., Spaccini, R., & Piccolo, A. (2007). Relationship between molecular characteristics of soil humic fractions and glycolytic pathway and Krebs cycle in maize seedlings. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 39(12), 3138-46.

Olaetxea, M., Mora, V., Baigorri, R., Zamarreño, A. M., & García-Mina, J. M. (2020). The singular molecular conformation of humic acids in solution influences their ability to enhance root hydraulic conductivity and plant growth. Molecules, 26(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26010003

Prabhakar, M., Hebbar, S. S., & Nair, A. K. (2010). Production technology of vegetable crops-A hand book. Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hessarghatta, Bangalore, Karnataka, 87-92.

Rose, M. T., Patti, A. F., Little, K. R., Brown, A. L., Jackson, W. R., & Cavagnaro, T. R. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: practical implications for agriculture. Advances in agronomy, 124, 37-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800138-7.00002-4

Russell, L., Stokes, A. R., Macdonald, H., Muscolo, A., & Nardi, S. (2006). Stomatal responses to humic substances and auxin are sensitive to inhibitors of phospholipase A2. Plant and Soil, 283, 175-185.

Sheoran, O. P., Tonk, D. S., Kaushik, L. S., Hasija, R. C., & Pannu, R. S. (1998). Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar, 139-143.

Sible, C. N., Seebauer, J. R., & Below, F. E. (2021). Plant biostimulants: A categorical review, their implications for row crop production, and relation to soil health indicators. Agronomy, 11(7), 1297. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy110 7129739.

Singandhupe, R. B., James, B. K., Antony, E., Nanda, P., & Behera, M. S. (2007). Response of drip fertigation and mulching on growth and fruit yield of pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica). Indian. J Agril. Sci., 77(1), 8-13

Sivakumar, K., Devarajan, L., Dhanasekaran, K., Venkatakrishnan, D., & Surendran, U. (2007). Effect of humic acid on the Yield and nutrient uptake of rice. ORYZA-An International Journal on Rice, 44(3), 277-279.

Sunarya, Y., & Tedjaningsih, T. (2016). Increasing nitrogen fertilizer efficiency on wetland rice by using humic acid. Journal of Tropical Soils, 20(3), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.5400/jts.2015.20.3.143

Tahir, M. M., Khurshid, M., Khan, M. Z., Abbasi, M. K., & Kazmi, M. H. (2011). Lignite-derived humic acid effect on growth of wheat plants in different soils. Pedosphere, 21(1), 124-131.

Yoshida, C., Iwasaki, Y., Makino, A., & Ikeda, H. (2011). Effects of irrigation management on the growth and fruit yield of tomato under drip fertigation. Horticultural Research, 10(3), 325-331.

Zhang, X. C., & Shangguan, Z. P. (2007). Effect of nitrogen fertilization on photosynthetic pigment and fluorescence characteristics in leaves of winter wheat cultivars on dryland. J. Nuclear Agric. Sci., 21, 299-304.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.