EFFECT OF SUBSTRATE TYPES ON THE SURVIVAL OF TOMATO VINE CUTTING TECHNOLOGY IN NIGERIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Due to the high cost of tomato seeds, it is important to fully exploit the seeds for economic gains. This has necessitated the use of vine cutting technology in tomato production from vegetative parts. However, the vine acclimatization substrates type plays important role in the survival of the cut vines. Hence, this study investigates three different substrate types (cocopeat, water and loamy soil) for their suitability for vines cutting. Seeds of three tomato genotypes were raised in hydroponics system containing dissolved cocopeat. At one month after planting, vines were cut from the plants into the three substrates in a Completely Randomized Design with three replicates. Data were collected on vine survival, days to new shoot formation, number of fruits per plant and the average fruit weight at harvest. Data collected were analyzed using ANOVA and differences in the treatment means were separated using the Least Significant Differences at 5 % level of significance. Results obtained showed that the percentage vine survival across the substrates was insignificant with a success rate of up to 77 % in the loamy soil. However, new shoot formation was fastest in the cocopeat substrate (12.56±0.53), while San marzano had the heaviest fruit size (20.73±1.33).
Downloads
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Endut, A., Jusoh, A., Ali, N., & Wan Nik, W. B. (2011). Nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater by vegetable production in aquaponics recirculation system. Desalination Water Treat, 32, 422–430.
Heder, B., Paulo, C. C., José, A. T. D., José, F. T. D., & Edvaldo, F. D. (2010). Tomato seedling production by cuttings rooted in different substrates. IDESIA, 28(1), 9-15.
Khan, M., Jan, M., Farhatullah, D., Khan, D. N., Arif, M., Perveen, S., Khan, S., Abbas, A. & Jan, A. (2011). The effect of using waste water for tomato. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43, 1033-1044.
Nasir, M. U., Hussain, S., & Jabba, S. (2015). Tomato processing, lycopene and health benefits: a review. Science Letters, 3(1), 1-5.
Ossai, C. O., Ogbole, S., Balogun, M. O., Akpeji, S. C., Olorode, E. M., & Taiwo, J. O. (2020). Tomato Production through Vine Cutting Technology in Hydroponics System. Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Studies, 1(2), 1-5.
Pascual, J., Ceglie, F., Tuzel, Y., Koller, M., Koren, A., Hitchings, R., & Tittarelli, F. (2018). Organic substrate for transplant production in organic nurseries. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 38. 10.1007/s13593-018-0508-4
Suvo, T. P., Biswas, H., Jewel, M. H.,Islam, M. S., & Khan, M. S. I. (2016). Impact of substrates on soilless tomato cultivation. Int. J.Agric. Res. Innov. and Tech, 6(2), 82-86.
Vinha, A. F., Barreira, S. V. P., Costa, A. S. G., Alves, R. C., & Oliveira, M. B. P. P. (2014). Organic versus conventional tomatoes: Influence on physicochemical parameters, bioactive compounds and sensorial attributes. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 67,139–144.